Showing posts with label search engines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label search engines. Show all posts

Sunday, March 2, 2014

REPOST: 2029: The year when robots will have the power to outsmart their makers



Ray Kurzweil, Google’s director of engineering, envisions a future where computers could outsmart humans, at least in terms of natural language understanding. The Guardian keeps tabs on his vision called “the singularity” and how he’s making the concept a reality for the search engine behemoth.

Garry Kasparov versus Deep Blue in 1997 
Image Source: theguardiancom

Computers will be cleverer than humans by 2029, according to Ray Kurzweil, Google's director of engineering.

The entrepreneur and futurologist has predicted that in 15 years' time computers will be more intelligent than we are and will be able to understand what we say, learn from experience, make jokes, tell stories and even flirt.

Kurzweil, 66, who is considered by some to be the world's leading artificial intelligence (AI) visionary, is recognised by technologists for popularising the idea of "the singularity" – the moment in the future when men and machines will supposedly converge. Google hired him at the end of 2012 to work on the company's next breakthrough: an artificially intelligent search engine that knows us better than we know ourselves.

In an interview in today's Observer New Review, Kurzweil says that the company hasn't given him a particular set of instructions, apart from helping to bring natural language understanding to Google.

"My project is ultimately to base search on really understanding what the language means," he said. "When you write an article, you're not creating an interesting collection of words. You have something to say and Google is devoted to intelligently organising and processing the world's information.

"The message in your article is information, and the computers are not picking up on that. So we would want them to read everything on the web and every page of every book, then be able to engage in intelligent dialogue with the user to be able to answer their questions."

Kurzweil's prediction comes hot on the tail of revelations that Google is in the throes of assembling the greatest artificial intelligence laboratory on Earth. The company has bought several machine-learning and robotics companies, including Boston Dynamics, the firm that produces lifelike military robots, for an undisclosed sum; and the smart thermostat maker, Nest Labs, for $3.2bn (£1.9bn).

This month it bought the cutting-edge British artificial intelligence startup DeepMind for £242m and hired Geoffrey Hinton, a British computer scientist and the world's leading expert on neural networks.

Kurzweil is known for inventing devices that have changed the world – the first flatbed scanner, the first computer program that could recognise a typeface, and the first text-to-speech synthesiser. In 1990 he predicted that a computer would defeat a world chess champion by 1998 (in 1997, IBM's Deep Blue defeated Garry Kasparov), and he predicted the future prominence of the world wide web at a time when it was only an obscure system that was used by a few academics.

For years he has been saying that the Turing test – the moment at which a computer will exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to that of a human – will be passed in 2029. "Today, I'm pretty much at the median of what AI experts think and the public is kind of with them," he adds. "The public has seen things like Siri [the iPhone's voice-recognition technology], where you talk to a computer. They've seen the Google self-driving cars. My views are not radical any more."

Kurzweil had been working with Google's co-founder, Larry Page, on special projects over several years until Page offered him a job. "I'd been having ongoing conversations with him about artificial intelligence and what Google is doing and what I was trying to do," he notes.

"And basically he said, 'Do it here. We'll give you the independence you've had with your own company, but you'll have these Google-scale resources.'"

In 2009 Kurzweil co-founded the Singularity University, partly funded by Google, an unaccredited graduate school devoted to his ideas and the aim of exploring exponential technologies.

Tech visionaries at MySearchResults are devoted to Kurzweil’s idea of empowering search engines with the capability to engage an intelligent dialogue with users. Click here to learn how the Web search aggregator is making great strides toward a smarter and more streamlined approach to online searching.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

REPOST: The astounding rise of ‘search engines’ and ‘social media,’ in 3 charts



Search engines and social networking have been so ubiquitous in the first decades of the new millennium that it is hard to believe that they weren't present a little over 20 years ago. These three charts, explained by Brian Fung of the Washington Post highlight the rise of the search engine, which took place around the same time as the emergence of social networking sites.

Google Ngram, the tool that lets you chart the relative frequency of words as they appear in English and foreign literature over time, has now added support for wildcard searches. This means you can plug in a search for "bar *" and conceivably get results not just for "bar stool" but also phrases like "bar exam" and "bar none."

In a moment of meta-ness this weekend, I searched for "search *_NOUN" — which will return only phrases with the word "search" followed by a noun.

Image source: washingtonpost.com

Whether Google's rise has something to do with the more recent decline in the term "search engine" is anyone's guess. It's been seven years, after all, since Google was added as a verb to Merriam-Webster and the Oxford English Dictionary — and arguably even longer since people began using the company's name as a stand-in for "search" in common parlance.

The dip might also be partly explained by the industry's move away from search-engine optimization. As the Web got more complex, Google adjusted its algorithms so publishers couldn't simply load a page with keywords to boost its profile. A decline in the pace of new books mentioning SEO could have a small but measurable impact. In fact — bearing in mind that this is an unscientific study — that may be approximately what we see here; while SEO continues to appear in books, the rate of growth seems to have slowed beginning in 2005.

Another possible explanation could be our collective shift toward social media, which has become an increasing focus in literature since the 2000s.

Image source: washingtonpost.com

Although "social media" appears in just a tiny fraction of English books — it doesn't even show up when you search Ngram for "social *_NOUN" — its rate of growth in literature has been even faster than it was for "search engines." That said, the track record for social media is a lot shorter; it'd be unwise to presume anything about its trajectory from just a decade of prominence.

It's also worth noting that 2008 is the most recent year for which Ngram provides data; we don't really know what's happened to "search engines," "social media," "google" or other terms in the years since. Still, what we are able to see paints a fascinating picture of where we've already been.

Search engines have, since the late 2000s, dominated the Internet, with independent players like My Search Results flourishing among its giant mainstream counterparts.  Visit this website for more on online searches.

Monday, March 25, 2013

German copyright law takes aim at Google links



The ancillary copyright bill was approved by Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, on March 1, granting publishers the right to charge companies for reproducing their online content. However, search engines like Google, Bing, MySearchResults, and Yahoo! are still allowed to display snippets or small excerpts from publishers’ websites for free. However, what defines a ‘snippet’ or a ‘small excerpt’ is a bit of a grey area in the copyright law.

Image Source: thetechblock.com















In its original form, the ancillary bill had Google carping. Google would bear the brunt had the bill been passed in its damaging form – requiring news aggregators and search engines to pay royalties for the commercial use of snippets or excerpts of their content. Oppositions said that the original proposal would force Internet giants like Google into a profit-sharing scheme that’s encroaching the free flow of information and innovation online.

Image Source: brocku.ca




















Other activists saw the original proposal as an offshoot of lobbying against the glaring sales disparity between Google and German press publishers. Apparently, Google earns billions of euros from its advertising and online services without having to sell advertising campaigns on its news aggregation service in Germany while the news publishers are earning a measly amount from their online advertisements.

Image Source: conversationmarketing.com

















These congruent validations made up the rationalization to repurpose the ancillary bill. A last-minute change on the copyright law by the Free Democratic Party required only the companies reproducing the whole content to compensate the publishers.

The Bundesrat is yet to decide on the ancillary copyright bill.

MySearchResults handles aggregate data from major search engines. Try it at MySearchResults.com.